W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Drop lastPosition from Geolocation?

From: Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:25:19 -0800
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CD05918D-51C6-4669-A482-A2CCF2AF454D@apple.com>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>

+1 Yeah, as far is I can tell, it isn't set unless you have set up a  
watch or get in the first place. Might as well cache it yourself, if  
you need it for some reason.


On Nov 17, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:

> +1
>
> Caching is better left to the "location provider".  But I suspect  
> that I have a different perspective and reasoning.
>
> Add:
> 3) The only benefit this adds is for the browser/user/device.  There  
> is no incentive for the site to use this, so it will inevitably will  
> be ignored by sites.
>
> There are better ways to achieve the goals this is trying to  
> address.  You've already heard from me on that.
>
> Martin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-geolocation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-geolocation-
>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Turner
>> Sent: Monday, 17 November 2008 3:42 PM
>> To: public-geolocation
>> Subject: Drop lastPosition from Geolocation?
>>
>>
>> Where are we on the lastPosition attribute?
>>
>> I would like to remove it because:
>>
>> 1) synchronous API are impossible to deal with from a UI/Security  
>> POV.
>>
>> 2) do not see the performance win they are supposedly have.
>>
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 22:25:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:54:08 GMT