Re: Position Heading Questions?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Thomson, Martin
<Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote:
> Fair point.
>
> I think that will continue to disagree on the "very different" point.  Conceptually, I see that orientation is another aspect of position.
>
> Let us instead look at the alternative: a separate "physical-orientation" working group with a new draft.

Or maybe have the new draft done by this WG? It would seem the nicest
option to me.

>  Our would you instead recommend that it be punted to "v2".  My view is that the cost/benefit of this feature is demonstrably favourable.
>

I tend to agree. If more people want it in this spec, v2 could work as well.

Thanks,
Andrei