W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > November 2008

Re: What about Reverse Geocoding?

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:53:58 +0000
Message-ID: <708552fb0811110953w72f208f0qc5a2b2cd696f8da3@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>

Hi Martin,

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Thomson, Martin
<Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> I think that you've got it, but rather than could, I'm saying "should".  The API shouldn't assume that the two have the same source, but it doesn't need to be.
>
> Rather than saying that we should revisit reverse geocoding in version 2, you should be saying that we should revisit _civic addresses_ in version 2.

Ok, fair enough. I suspect we'll see more demand for this once this
spec opens up to a larger audience, so I believe it'll be one of the
top discussion items for v2.

All the best,
Andrei
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 17:54:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:13:30 GMT