- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:53:58 +0000
- To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Hi Martin, On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > I think that you've got it, but rather than could, I'm saying "should". The API shouldn't assume that the two have the same source, but it doesn't need to be. > > Rather than saying that we should revisit reverse geocoding in version 2, you should be saying that we should revisit _civic addresses_ in version 2. Ok, fair enough. I suspect we'll see more demand for this once this spec opens up to a larger audience, so I believe it'll be one of the top discussion items for v2. All the best, Andrei
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 17:54:37 UTC