Re: Remarks on GeoLocation Spec

That's better !

Thanks Andrei

That closes my initial remarks

Regards,

Mohamed

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:06:27 +0200, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Keeping it milliseconds matches the timestamp of the mouse event:
> >>
> >> timeStamp of type DOMTimeStamp, readonly
> >>     Used to specify the time (in milliseconds relative to the epoch) at
> >> which the event was created. Due to the fact that some systems may not
> >> provide this information the value of timeStamp may be not available for
> all
> >> events. When not available, a value of 0 will be returned. Examples of
> epoch
> >> time are the time of the system start or 0:0:0 UTC 1st January 1970.
> >>
> >> I think we should be consistent here.
> >
> > That's fine, but that would still require changing the specification as
> it
> > doesn't use DOMTimeStamp currently.
> >
>
> I agree, thanks for pointing this out. I've updated the spec to use
> DOMTimeStamp (and also fixed a few typos at the same time).
>
> Also, please note that xs:dateTime is not really relevant here since
> it is an XML Schema data type. About the DOMTimeStamp type, the DOM 3
> Core spec [1] says :
>
> "For ECMAScript, DOMTimeStamp  is bound to the Date type"
>
> I think the Date type is sophisticated enough for our purposes?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html#Core-DOMTimeStamp
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €