Re: Scope Proposal

+1

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Luz Caballero <luzc@opera.com> wrote:

> lgtm too
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:26:55 -0800, Tom Wiltzius <wiltzius@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Ditto.
>>
>> On Thursday, November 10, 2011, Vincent Scheib wrote:
>>
>>  Still looks good to me.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Erik Möller <emoller@opera.com
>>> <javascript:**_e({}, 'cvml', 'emoller@opera.com');>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:20:39 +0100, Boaz Sender <boaz@bocoup.com
>>>> <javascript:_**e({}, 'cvml', 'boaz@bocoup.com');>>
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I've tried to synthesize everyone's suggestions in this charter:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> """
>>>>> The goal of the games community group is to improve the quality of open
>>>>> web
>>>>> standards that game developers rely on to create games. This is done
>>>>> by:
>>>>>  * Tracking specifications and vendor implementations related to open
>>>>> web
>>>>> games.
>>>>>  * Recommending new specifications to be produced and finding working
>>>>> group homes for them.
>>>>>  * Refining use cases to communicate specific needs of games.
>>>>>  * Evangelizing specifications to browser vendors.
>>>>>  * Documenting how to best use open web standards for games
>>>>>  * Evangelizing open web standards to game developers and game
>>>>> development
>>>>> best practices to web developers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The games community group will not develop any specifications, and
>>>>> thus,
>>>>> there will not be any Essential Claims under the W3C Contributor
>>>>> License
>>>>> Agreement or Final Specification Agreement.
>>>>> """
>>>>>
>>>>> Any last words before we publish it tomorrow?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Boaz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I support this charter. Like Charles said with regards to mobile and
>>>> other platforms (in a way you guys should be familiar with by now)
>>>> "Opera
>>>> cares!".
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Erik Möller
>>>> Core Developer
>>>> Opera Software
>>>> twitter.com/erikjmoller
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>