Re: [fxtf-drafts] Fix the backdrop-filter order of operations to get opacity right (#361)

Huh. This change is the opposite of what my expectations are with respect to opacity. I would expect `opacity: 0` to show none of the filtered backdrop, only the unfiltered backdrop.

@mfreed7, here's what you wrote in https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/53#issuecomment-442275033:
> There are several examples where it would make sense for the filtered backdrop to form the starting point for the backdrop-filtered element, so that opacity (and other filters) would apply to that filtered content. One example would be a dialog box that “fades out”.

I very much agree with that sentence, and I'm curious what caused your change of heart.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mstange
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/pull/361#issuecomment-515139788 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 25 July 2019 17:35:36 UTC