- From: ewilligers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:56:54 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
>> such as when the element is larger than the containing element. > > In this case, no matter how the element moves, it can't avoid being clipped. > So the element could be positioned along the path with having the smallest clipped area by moving the shortest distance. Suppose the path size is 0px and/or offset-anchor is very large in magnitude. In such cases, the clipped area can be always 100% regardless of offset-distance. Minimally increasing the path size is a good solution. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/22#issuecomment-311526691 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2017 00:57:00 UTC