- From: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:29:17 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
@dirkschulze Why is this interface `[NoInterfaceObject]` at all? That's an antipattern, and one that doesn't seem to be needed for web compat, nor for future-compat (in that this is not a name anyone is likely to want to use for anything else). Maybe this dates back to when people were trying to remove this interface and use sequences instead? But if we've given up on that, we should just give it a normal interface object. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bzbarsky Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/233#issuecomment-354396447 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 29 December 2017 04:29:19 UTC