Re: [css-transforms][fill-stroke] Discussing Open Issues

I would definitely be interested in participating in both discussions
(Transforms, and Fill/Stroke).

The old SVG WG time works for me, but if need be I can usually make time.
My middle of the night is 6:00UTC to 13:00UTC, but outside of that than
that I can make it work.

~Amelia Bellamy-Royds

On 4 April 2017 at 15:12, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> Hi SVGWG,
> There are a number of open issues on CSS Transforms that need your help.
> They're documented in the DoC with “=SVGWG=” and are summarized below.
>   https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-1/issues-wd-2013
> The new Fill/Stroke spec also has a ton of open issues which will need
> discussion/resolution:
>   https://drafts.fxtf.org/fill-stroke/#issues-index
>
> The CSSWG suggests setting up a joint SVGWG/CSSWG call to find resolutions
> for these issues. If you're interested in participating, please help us
> pick a time. :)
>
> We're currently suggesting to take the old SVGWG call slot, say, next week,
> but are open to other timing suggestions.
>
> Please respond to this thread to say
> a) If you are interested in participating wrt Transforms and/or Fill+Stroke
> b) If you can attend this week or next week at
>      https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month
> =04&day=06&year=2017&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
> c) If you would strongly prefer a different time or date (pls indicate
> restrictions)
>
> You can respond either to the list (public-fx only, please)
> or directly to me. I'll compile the data and try to set up
> a call or series thereof. :)
>
> Note: Reply-to header set to public-fx@
>
> In the meantime, feel free to comment on the issues~
>
> Thanks~
> ~fantasai
>
> ----
> Issue 21.
> Summary:  Unitless values
> From:     Tab Atkins
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDDDDMY0czypkLQ2X8tBtLFjYn5t9g+
> aYOPBzXLEAGzBzA@mail.gmail.com
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDD3VfCvDfe0TEUJEd7e+JXZzhRDGTyEg
> dc9Hodz0pCLUQ@mail.gmail.com
> Open:     =ED= Edit.
> Resolved: =WG= Resolve on this unless objections.
> ----
> Issue 23.
> Summary:  User coordinate space statement breaks SVG
> From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7yhF7Qn28wVMqb7ra6N9Q=j74OTqHWpj
> LeYrH=LQwmd4A@mail.gmail.com
> Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/893
> Open:     =WG= Discuss with =SVGWG= folks.
> ----
> Issue 24.
> Summary:  Issues with transform on SVG root
> From:     Dirk Schulze
> Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/0A9D2705-9FFE-425B-B3CB-297EA97D337D@
> adobe.com
> Open:     =SVGWG= Figure out if anything remains to be done.
> ----
> Issue 25.
> Summary:  Transforms on root SVG element
> From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAFDDJ7xQp+j2c+18zkRyPWPtnuk+dbVA6Dc_
> L7ACr-tptAGicA@mail.gmail.com
> Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/894
> Open:     =WG= Discuss with SVG folks
> ----
> Issue 55.
> Summary:  animateTransform thread of unclear conclusion
> From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/201204261843.03940.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
> Continue: http://www.w3.org/mid/C3DB860D-28F2-4388-9D9E-513597FFAFE4@
> adobe.com
> Open:     =SVGWG= Figure out if this thread is 100% handled
> Resolved:
> ----
> Issue 56.
> Summary:  Deprecate animateTransform
> From:     Dr. Olaf Hoffman
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/86583EBE-30F0-41BD-B3E2-E6D5588BB821@
> adobe.com
> Open:     =SVGWG= Figure this out and respond to thread.
> Resolved:
> ----
> Issue 57.
> Summary:  Neutral element for addition wrt animating transforms
> From:     Dirk Schulze
> Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/24BE3FE7-60C9-4690-A01C-F2291460DE7F@
> adobe.com
> Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/932
> Open:     =WG=/=SVGWG= Discuss.
> ----
>
>