On 22/09/16 9:00 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > I think you just showed that Matt's proposal can be emulated with the > current spec. I don't think this is true. Firstly, this example still wasn't as good as I think mine could be. Secondly, it requires complex matrix manipulation by the author, which basically rules out animations/transitions. > > Given that: > > * this is shipping in Chrome [1] > * Safari committed to support it [2] > * Edge is in favor [3] > * Firefox has already implemented it [4] > * your new proposal is more complex to implement and hard to understand > * your new proposal can be emulated > I agreed (and changed Firefox) under the assumption that little to no web content would be affected. This thread was started by an author who's content was broken, so it seems reasonable to re-visit these assumptions. - Matt
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 10:54:29 UTC