Hi :) 2014-04-17 0:30 GMT+02:00 Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Domenic Denicola < > domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > >> Regardless of spec examples, all of the real-world CSS transition and >> animation code I've seen uses the ms unit, not the s one. I don't think CSS >> provides any guidance here. >> > > The first three sites I found transitions on use seconds: > google.com uses 0.1s, 0.5s (not 100ms, 500ms). > twitter.com uses 0.3s (not 300ms) > www.smh.com.au uses 0.4s, 0.1s (not 400ms, 100ms) > This is statistically inaccurate. There are millions of web sites out there. How those three could be representative of all the rest? > Literally the first 3 transitions tutorials I found use seconds: > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/CSS/Using_CSS_transitions > http://css3.bradshawenterprises.com/transitions/ > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/tutorials/css_transitions > Which does not presume of what users are truly doing. CSS support both second and millisecond. If both are supported, it's because both are used. > Do you have counter-examples? > Unfortunately, no time now to provide you a list, but basically, all the web sites my company is working on (we prefer using milliseconds... but I do not assume our behavior is the general one) It would be great if you could provide more accurate statistics. best -- Jeremie ............................. Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 22:41:34 UTC