W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [filter-effects] drop-shadow inset shadow

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:28:14 -0700
Message-Id: <6D253827-94DA-46B6-AD73-215F945183A9@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Alexandru Chiculita <achicu@adobe.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Mar 30, 2013, at 8:05 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Currently the drop-shadow shorthand filter does not support inset shadows and the inset keyword (in comparison to box-shadow for instance). I wonder if this could be added to the spec and would like to hear implementers input.
>> Most shorthands have the advantage that they can easily be HW accelerated. This already seems not always be the case for drop-shadow on some platforms. However,  I do not think that it is harder to implement inset shadow, even if it will be of course slower than other filters.
>> Here is a short example how to use inset shadows with SVG Filters today[1]:
>>                <filter id="innershadow" x0="-50%" y0="-50%" width="200%" height="200%">
>>                        <feGaussianBlur in="SourceAlpha" stdDeviation="2" result="blur"/>
>>                        <feOffset dy="3" dx="3"/>
>>                        <feComposite in2="SourceAlpha" operator="arithmetic"
>>                                        k2="-1" k3="1" result="shadowDiff"/>
>>                        <feFlood flood-color="black" flood-opacity="1"/>
>>                        <feComposite in2="shadowDiff" operator="in"/>
>>                        <feComposite in2="SourceGraphic" operator="over"/>
>>                </filter>
>> Implementations could replace the inset shadow in the CSS string with an equivalent filter chain as above.
>> Greetings,
>> Dirk
>> [1] http://ledrug.wordpress.com/2010/09/30/learning-svg-lesson-2/
> +1, and it would also be nice to support spread, if that's possible to
> do in filters.

I agree. I haven't tried Dirk's code, but I do hope filters can gain the ability to do inner shadows and spread. I don't know what primitives can be used to create the spread effect, though. It seems like it needs something like PhotoShop's 'maximize' and 'minimize' filters:

Received on Saturday, 30 March 2013 15:29:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 22 June 2015 03:33:49 UTC