W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [filter-effects] shader security model

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 01:41:50 -0800
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-svg@w3.org list" <www-svg@w3.org>, "bjacob@mozilla.com" <bjacob@mozilla.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130307094150.GA12391@crum.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2013-03-06 11:54 -0800, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:35 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> > My objection in the CSS WG meeting was based on the 10 seconds I had
> > to consider an agenda item that was raised at the last minute
> > (during the meeting), and was not carefully thought out.
> 
> It was a request to preserve the current state of the editors draft as working draft to reflect the changes that we made in the last months. I added this request to the FXTF agenda as well. Not enough people called in to discuss this step why I need to bring it up on each working group.
> 
> I am absolutely in favor for the request of Tab to move resolution process on publication to the mailing list. I think this would address your request of asynchronous decision making.

After discussion with some colleagues, I withdraw my objection to
publication.

My comment about having more advance notice to consider such
requests still stands, though; I don't think the working group
should be resolving on things after 30 seconds consideration.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 09:42:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 March 2013 09:42:16 GMT