W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [filter-effects] shader security model

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:26:51 -0800
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: "www-svg@w3.org list" <www-svg@w3.org>, "bjacob@mozilla.com" <bjacob@mozilla.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F284F64D-9E21-43F4-AEAC-0842F7678522@adobe.com>

On Mar 6, 2013, at 11:23 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday 2013-03-06 11:00 -0800, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> I wanted to resolve on a new working draft not only because of the changes to custom filters, but more because of a lot of clarifications for the other filter primitives and shorthand filters. At this point I do not see shaders blocking the standardization process of the whole spec. Should people still be concerned about the implementation status of shaders later in the process, we can put shaders on the risk list before going to CR. It may go into the next level of Filter Effects at this point.
>> 
>> Do you disagree with this strategy?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> I think trying to postpone dealing with objections is a bad
> strategy.

I would like to understand your concerns more. Your objection in the CSS WG meeting were mainly based on the security concerns that you had. I hope I could clarify this point.

Greetings,
Dirk

> 
> -David
> 
> -- 
> 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> 𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂

Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 19:27:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 March 2013 19:27:37 GMT