W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2013

Utility of background-composite and background-blend-mode?

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:41:49 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZGmaNE7-zKN8v_j3cFg==+f5EW6-Sw=LfQWcDRneNvRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-fx@w3.org
What is the difference between background-blend-mode:<MODE> and
mix-blend-mode: background <MODE>?

What are the use-cases for 'background-composite'? It seems like a very
specialized feature whose effect can be achieved pretty easily by just
using more elements or (in some cases) pseudo-elements.

Rob
-- 
Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
— whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 21:42:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 31 January 2013 21:42:17 GMT