- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:55:05 -0800
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- CC: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Just as a note. While I agree that blend/composite modes between different shadows will not be used a lot (or even needed), I would disagree with that on multiple backgrounds. This seems to be very useful, for some effects like water marks or similar things. Greetings, Dirk On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Rik, > > I thought we agreed that the use case of applying different blending modes to different shadows/background images/etc was pretty rare and we'd resort to simpler syntax for now that covers the more common use cases? Did I misunderstand? > > No, you didn't misunderstand. > The spec is updated so you blend the composited result of the shadows and the background images. > For instance, see https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#box-shadow-blend-mode: > Sets the blend mode of the composited result of all the box shadows. > > I did not update background-composite since we didn't discuss it and currently matches an existing webkit only feature. > > Rik > > > > On Dec 11, 2012, at 03:52, Rik Cabanier wrote: > >> All, >> >> I updated the spec per today's decision: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html >> Please let me know if you have any questions or ideas for improvement. >> >> Thanks! >> Rik > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:56:02 UTC