W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Updated to the blending and compositing spec (was: minutes, December 10 2012, FXTF telcon)

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:55:05 -0800
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
CC: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EB5E5212-5D3F-41B9-88B3-70A3D571753F@adobe.com>
Just as a note. While I agree that blend/composite modes between different shadows will not be used a lot (or even needed), I would disagree with that on multiple backgrounds. This seems to be very useful, for some effects like water marks or similar things.

Greetings,
Dirk
 
On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi Rik,
> 
> I thought we agreed that the use case of applying different blending modes to different shadows/background images/etc was pretty rare and we'd resort to simpler syntax for now that covers the more common use cases? Did I misunderstand?
> 
> No, you didn't misunderstand.
> The spec is updated so you blend the composited result of the shadows and the background images.
> For instance, see https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#box-shadow-blend-mode:
> Sets the blend mode of the composited result of all the box shadows.
> 
> I did not update background-composite since we didn't discuss it and currently matches an existing webkit only feature.
> 
> Rik
>  
> 
> 
> On Dec 11, 2012, at 03:52, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I updated the spec per today's decision: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html
>> Please let me know if you have any questions or ideas for improvement.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>>    Rik
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:56:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:56:03 GMT