W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Specifying mask type for <mask> elements

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:02:20 -0700
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <83063B5F-F66C-419A-B8AD-FA224943F822@adobe.com>


On Sep 25, 2012, at 7:57 PM, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:

> Dirk Schulze:
>> Given the fact that a <mask> can rarely be used for both, alpha and
>> luminance mask, I would be in favor to not change the current
>> grammar. Authors will define masks for one of the masking types.
> 
> But we still need to allow the type in the 'mask' property when it is
> referencing a non-<mask> element, right?
It is an optional part of mask-image, so yes.

Dirk
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 03:03:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 September 2012 03:03:09 GMT