- From: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:16:51 -0500
- To: Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com>
- Cc: public-fx@w3.org, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Matt Woodrow <mwoodrow@mozilla.com>
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com> wrote: > The rendering should be identical to: > > data:text/html,<!doctype html> > <div style="transform-style: preserve-3d"> > <div style="transform-style: flat; opacity: 0.8"> <!-- note flat --> > <div style="height:100px; width:100px; background:lime; > transform: translatez(10px)"></div> > <div style="height:100px; width:100px; background:red; > transform: translate3d(0, -50px, -10px)"></div> > </div> > <div style="height:100px; width:100px; background:yellow; > transform: translate3d(50px, -175px, -20px)"></div> > </div> This has the red box on top of the green box, and the yellow box on top of both. Is this really what we want? I'd expect the green box on top of the red box, and both of them on top of the yellow box. > It should look like this: > <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1087> (note that W3C bugzilla > is lame and will cause you to download this image). I agree this picture is the rendering we want -- it has the green box on top of the red box on top of the yellow box. transform-style: flat will give the reverse ordering in this case, so I don't think it's what we want.
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 20:17:44 UTC