W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [css3-transforms] transform-origin syntax: 3D vs. background-position

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:10:12 -0800
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <075672F3-BA06-454D-953B-3B7520298F56@adobe.com>

On Feb 23, 2012, at 7:52 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> Any solution that involves reverting background-position won't fly -
> it's been stable for a long time, and is useful.

But Aryeh is right. Calc() would duplicate the functionality and is even more powerful. And what do you mean with stable if nearly no browser support multiple arguments that get added (does a browser support it at all?)? Just that we have tests for it that no one passes?

> I am equally comfortable with 1, 2, and 4.
> ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:10:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 22 June 2015 03:33:46 UTC