W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Minutes, FXTF F2F Hamburg 9 May 2012

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:42:29 +0200
To: public-fx@w3.org, "Brian Birtles" <birtles@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.weafo3hqgeuyw5@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:19:51 +0200, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> (2012/05/11 17:47), Erik Dahlstrom wrote:
> ...
>> SVG attributes becoming properties
> ...
>> ed: third issue, certain things that used to be content in SVG are now
>> styleable
>> ... e.g. width/height
>> ... proposed resolution is to just accept that
>> ... implication is that you no longer have to put them in the content
>>
>> ?: Will it be valid not to specify width/height on an element thenkrit
>
> Two amendments to the minutes here. Firstly, the above was my comment.
>
> Secondly, in the meeting Erik and I looked this up and width/height on  
> rect are REQUIRED, (not IMPLIED). i.e. if they are not specified the  
> element is invalid. The SVG DTD may need to be updated to support  
> promoting SVG attributes to properties.
>
> We discussed this in the meeting but it didn't make the minutes.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brian Birtles

In that conversation I also mentioned that in SVG Tiny 1.2 the width and  
height on rect are optional.


-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 07:43:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 May 2012 07:43:08 GMT