On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does it matter if it's code that only the author understands? It's > obviously > > working well enough for Wikipedia to create formulas and they have much > more > > complex math than us. > > It seems that we would have to do quite a bit of work ourselves > (including > > learning LaTex) instead of just using texvc. > > I think you're misunderstanding what texvc does -- it basically does > nothing but parse the input, make sure it looks like valid LaTeX with > all commands on its internal whitelist, wraps it in some boilerplate, > and then shells out to latex. Pretty much any valid texvc input is > already valid LaTeX, give or take some macros that texvc recognizes > and missing boilerplate that it adds. Everything you're entering into > Wikipedia's <math> tags *is* LaTeX. So there's not much gained by not > just using LaTeX. The effort of trying to get texvc set up in a > non-MediaWiki environment would likely be more than just learning how > to add the extra boilerplate LaTeX will want. > > Also, if all you want is a few PNGs, you can just enter the code in > Wikipedia, preview, and save the PNG. That's the easiest way. > I was actually planning on doing that :-) It would be a bit cleaner if I could just use the markup and the w3c server would do the magic. > > (Former MediaWiki developer here, BTW. :) ) >Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 16:15:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2012 16:15:22 GMT