W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Where should editorial resources on transforms go?

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:13:02 -0800
To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20111202201302.GA19182@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2011-12-02 12:06 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 2011-12-02 11:54 -0800, Vincent Hardy wrote:
> > We had that discussion and decided to go for a consolidated spec.
> > Unless there are new arguments for re-opening the discussion, I
> > think we should stick to our decision.
> 
> I was uncomfortable with that decision at the time, and unless
> someone can clarify how much delay the plans to merge will have on
> the timeline of the specification, I intend to object to it.

I'd also note that when we agreed to work on the merged document:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0178.html
we agreed that we still might accelerate the 2-D transforms draft.
I'm saying we should do this.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 20:13:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 December 2011 20:13:36 GMT