W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Where should editorial resources on transforms go?

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:06:42 -0800
To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20111202200642.GA19050@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2011-12-02 11:54 -0800, Vincent Hardy wrote:
> We had that discussion and decided to go for a consolidated spec.
> Unless there are new arguments for re-opening the discussion, I
> think we should stick to our decision.

I was uncomfortable with that decision at the time, and unless
someone can clarify how much delay the plans to merge will have on
the timeline of the specification, I intend to object to it.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 20:07:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 December 2011 20:07:10 GMT