W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2011

Transforms Spec (was: Mercurial Repository for FX TF)

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:01:40 -0500
Message-ID: <4D485894.3040301@w3.org>
To: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Hi, Patrick-

Patrick Dengler wrote (on 2/1/11 10:32 AM):
> Thanks for setting this up Doug.  I have a question.
>
> My understanding from when we were in  Lyon was that we were going to
> make sure that both CSS and SVG were agreed upon which assets we were
> working on.  This is a great step in that direction.  Having said
> that, I thought we agreed that this specification:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.html
> was the joint plan of record going forward.
>
> Can folks help clarify?

That's one of the specs we agreed to work on in the FX TF, yes.  Simon 
checked it into the FX CVS repo almost 2 months ago [1], but I don't 
know the current status; since we just set up the Hg repo, we could move 
it there, if the editors are open to that).  We should talk about it at 
the next telcon, but in the meantime, an on-list conversation is 
probably the best way to move it forward.

I would suggest reviewing the spec, finding where there are gaps or 
problems, or opportunities for improvements or enhancements, and raising 
the issues on the mailing list; having something concrete to address 
makes it easier on editors to actually make progress on their specs.

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/

Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:01:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:01:44 GMT