W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Agenda 3 April 2011 FXTF (Note the time)

From: Paul Bakaus <pbakaus@zynga.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:50:56 -0700
To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9C87F4C.5A7A%pbakaus@zynga.com>


Am 04.04.11 21:44 schrieb "Dean Jackson" unter <dino@apple.com>:

>Unfortunately I cannot attend this time on Mondays (until my summer time
>resumes). Double unfortunately, I have some input on the items below.
>
>I believe Simon will be on the call to represent Apple.
>
>On 29/03/2011, at 12:42 AM, Erik Dahlstrom wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>>  time: April 4, 2011, 20.00 UTC (see localtimes below[1])
>>  phone bridge: +1 617-761-6200 (Zakim)
>>  passcode: FXTF (3983)
>>  irc channel: #fx on irc.w3.org:6665
>> 
>> 
>> Agenda:
>> 
>> * SVG/CSS 2d transforms - 'transform-origin'
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2011JanMar/0158.html
>> 
>> * CSS Animation synchronization
>>  http://www.w3.org/mid/C9B60BA3.4F73%25pbakaus@zynga.com
>
>On this topic, I'd suggest that we don't always attempt to solve things
>in markup. Obviously if we *can* solve things in markup it's great, but
>if it means confusing syntax then I'd prefer to avoid it. My eventual
>dream with animation is that we come up with a general model that could
>do all these cool things we want - and then SMIL + CSS + JS are just ways
>to expose that model, each with a particular sweet spot.

YES, thank you. You just said the right thing. A great model for
animations, that could be just reyling on minimal markup and JS, or a lot
of markup and no JS. This is what we need.

> 
>
>> * Filter Effects status update
>
>I promise to get a draft out this week. I don't think there is anything
>too controversial - much of the discussion on the list has been about
>minor issues, and nearly everyone agrees on the direction. We simply need
>a specification to talk about!
>
>You might want to discuss the topic of whether or not we need the
>complete range of inputs for CSS filters. I think there is general
>agreement that the first pass does not require this feature, and a slight
>consensus of people suggesting the entire feature be left for SVG/XML
>filters completely.
>
>Dean
>
>> * CSS Animation of svg attributes status update
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [1] 
>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=04&year
>>=2011&hour=20&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
>> 
>> -- 
>> Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
>> Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>> Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
>> 
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 07:51:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 April 2011 07:51:35 GMT