W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Specification deliverables for FX Task Force work on 2D/3D Transforms

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:18:00 +0100
To: "Doug Schepers" <doug@schepers.cc>, "Dean Jackson" <dino@apple.com>
Cc: anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au, public-fx@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u8pb37oigeuyw5@printer.xn--dahlstrm-doa36b.net>
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:51:45 +0100, Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc> wrote:

> Hi, Dean-
> Dean Jackson wrote (on 2/25/10 1:36 PM):
>> On 25/02/2010, at 2:26 PM, Anthony Grasso wrote:
>>> While deciding on what the deliverables should be, we should take
>>> into account that CSS is applicable to SVG and HTML and that SVG
>>> may also be applicable HTML in the future in certain cases. Either
>>> the first or second option might be the way to go. That said, I
>>> have no strong opinion as long as we can justify the option we
>>> decide to take.
>> FWIW, we want to implement CSS Transforms on SVG content in WebKit.
> Awesome.

I'd like to see that implemented in Opera as well.

> What are the next steps?  Should we take a straw poll to see if everyone  
> is on board with option 1 (single spec with both syntaxes), and then  
> draft it up and put it in CVS?

A single spec sounds like the best option to me.


Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 21:18:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 22 June 2015 03:33:44 UTC