W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Transforms 1.0 - skew(<angle> [, <angle>])

From: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 03:53:16 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTilBsXfQs-YfC1rxuk-kjSoFdAsUdfVifCZ6oJ_i@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Cc: public-fx@w3.org
This looks like just an artifact of the merging process. The current
CSS 2D transforms working draft lists skew(<angle> [, <angle>]), but
it's been eliminated in the latest editor's draft:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/Overview.html?rev=1.12#transform-functions

2010/5/11 Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>:
> Hello public-fx, Anthony Grasso,
>
> this is a comment about
> http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.html
> (from today)
>
>
> As already mentioned in the CSS list about the corresponding draft about
> CSS transforms, it is not obvious, what skew(<angle> [, <angle>])
> means:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0039.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0046.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0124.html
>
> Would be nice to see a matrix representation or a composition of
> several basic, already defined transform for this - and this should
> really fit to the name skew  and should not be an arbitrary transformation
> not related to the name skew ;o)
>
> Another option would be of course to skip it. I think, this was already
> proposed somewhere from someone in a teleconference?
>
>
> Olaf
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 08:53:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 May 2010 08:53:49 GMT