W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > January 2016

Re: ACTION-2026

From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:58:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEUBDBDg9ZFEVbrksPnKn7qfNa0HSNZ513f71sdyG35oQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>, Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
All,

I had as a follow-up action to clean this up and add a separate entry for
both functions. That's done now:


https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#The_seconds-from-epoch.28.29_Function

I also:

- added a note to clarify that seconds-from-dateTime() is there for
backwards compatibility only.
- decided that we should expose the function under the new name in all
cases, not only in XPath 2.0 mode (to discuss)

Diff:


https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/index.php?title=XPath_Expressions_Module&diff=95&oldid=55

-Erik

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote:

> All,
>
> I did this one:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#The_seconds-from-epoch.28.29_Function
>
> Diff:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/index.php?title=XPath_Expressions_Module&diff=55&oldid=54
>
> I also restored the return value to xs:double, since the intent is
> that this function is really there for backward compatibility, even
> under its new name seconds-from-epoch.
>
> We might want to discuss briefly.
>
> -Erik
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 05:59:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 January 2016 05:59:08 UTC