W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Minutes 2012-09-19

From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:32:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEXGMH1f2TOYz_nnWJKfPZuYJLcKy57NXKz9yn4QB_QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>

Reading the minutes:

"so if we added valid(), then there'd be no reason not to add
relevant(), readonly() etc"

I had the following action item: "ACTION-1820 - Bruchez to write up
valid function", which was completed. I find in my notes that I had
started to write up the relevant()/required()/readonly() functions as

Nick, you'll let me know if you are doing it or want me to draft them up.


On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Steven Pemberton
<Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/09/19-forms-minutes.html
> Steven
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 17:33:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:07 UTC