W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > May 2012

XForms expression module diff version

From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:30:11 +0000
To: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A0C8659A-8ADA-4CAD-82A6-434F6C4C7C15@inventivegroup.com>

I managed to re-create a base version for the XForms Expression module and use this as a base for the diff version. I decided to not mark the change in notation of the function attributes as a change, because this isn't a real change but only a syntax change.

You can find the live diff version at http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXPath_Expressions_Module_base&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXPath_Expressions_Module<http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module_base&doc2=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#Acknowledgements_.28Non-Normative.29> any changes made to wiki spec will be reflected in the diff version.

Could all group members have a look at the differences and decide if they agree with those changes so we can advance this document and the XForms core document to FPWD.

Thanks in advance,

Nick Van den Bleeken
R&D Manager

Phone: +32 3 425 41 02
Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71

PS: I'm not completely happy with the diff marking (e.g.: the eval functions sections), but this is the best I could get it. Also be warned that the coloring schema isn't what you would expect (change: yellow, new:lime), for the FPWD version we can change the colors in the css if we want to.


Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 09:30:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:07 UTC