W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Can we resolve to go to FPWD before our charter expires on March 30

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:32:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEXZOXKX2-Ww=RRtDhJyrxu9Fqz_BMzh8VV6wS77Rvn=XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
Cc: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com>, Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Nick & all,

I guess Steven, Leigh, or John are qualified to answer the question on
dates.

I plan to spend some time reviewing the document, but it is a big task ;) I
also think that doing some kind of editorial meeting might be a good idea.

-Erik

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nick Van den Bleeken <
Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> wrote:

>  All,
>
>  First of all some things that we really need to agree on before I can
> generate the spec html:
> * What is the date that needs to be put on the document
> * How many days do we accept comments? Currently I used 42 days
>
>  I spent today fixing the import errors in the base document (which we
> also did in the XForms 2.0 wiki document) to get a better result in the
> diff version of the spec. If we are doing it for real it has to start from
> the generated spec html, but for now I'm running it directly from the wiki
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXForms_2.0_base&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXForms_2.0#Remove_Nodeset<http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0_base&doc2=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#Remove_Nodeset>
>
>
>  Could you all review the changes that were made in the XForms 2.0
> document? Also having a look at the new text in the XPath Expression module
> would be really appreciated
> https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/Drafts/WD-xforms-xpath-20120504/
>
>  I would have been a bit more comfortable that we had a 3 day FtF meeting
> to go over the changes, and maybe add some small features that are almost
> ready to port from the wiki to the XForms spec. But as Leigh pointed out
> our charter is almost expired...
>
>
>  Steven,
>
>  What are the next step that I have to do to get the document published?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nick Van den Bleeken
> R&D Manager
>
> Phone: +32 3 425 41 02
> Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71
> nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com
> www.inventivedesigners.com
>
>
>
>  On 27 Mar 2012, at 20:06, Leigh L Klotz Jr wrote:
>
>  Our charter nominally expires March 30.  While we can get an extension,
> we should surely go to FPWD before them.
>
> Can we resolve to go to FPWD this week?
>
> *If you cannot attend by phone, could you please attend by IRC so we can
> be sure of having a quorum, so we can meet our charter dates.*
>
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2009/charter2010.html
>
> Leigh.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
> http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
>


image003.png
(image/png attachment: image003.png)

image001.png
(image/png attachment: image001.png)

image002.png
(image/png attachment: image002.png)

Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 18:32:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:56 UTC