W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > June 2011

Re: JSON Instances

From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:10:41 +0000
To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
CC: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Message-ID: <8E4F6182-5DCF-45C8-8736-71F6CDF603B0@inventivegroup.com>
Steven,

Couldn't we use auto generated binds that attach the type information to the nodes for that?

Regards,

Nick van den Bleeken


On 30 May 2011, at 14:41, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:

> I should note a slight difference with what we had earlier agreed that dawned on me while firming it up, that got in the way of round-tripping.
>
> In the transformation of
>    {"size": 50} and {"size": "50"}
> you can't tell the difference if you transform both to
>    <json><size>50</size></json>
>
> So I've use the type attribute to (arbitrarily) mark the numeric case:
>
>    <json><size type="number">50</size><json>
>
> Similarly with the boolean and null cases.
>
> Steven
>
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:51:50 +0200, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
>> I have rewritten the JSON section, according to my action item.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/Json
>>
>> Comments gladly received.
>>
>> Steven
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

________________________________

Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 09:13:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:55 UTC