I added this revised test to the test suite, including the test suite zip
file.
The known discussion items for the test suite in the new year are tests
5.1.b (normalizedString and token) and 9.3.5.a (repeat-* attributes). All
other test suite improvements requested recently have now been made and
included in the zip file.
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
From:
Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
To:
Joern Turner <joern.turner@googlemail.com>
Cc:
public-forms@w3.org
Date:
12/16/2009 02:08 PM
Subject:
Re: regarding Testcase 5.1.a
Hi Joern -- Firefox is not so picky so I'm not sure if this version has
been updated as you suggest. There's now a namespace declaration on the
instance (and an extra one for good measure on the root document though
probably not needed there...).
Lacking any comments to the contrary, we'll include this in the updated
test suite zip file shortly. Thanks, Charlie Wiecha
(See attached file: 5.1.a.xhtml)
Charles Wiecha
Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 282-3483
wiecha@us.ibm.com
Joern Turner ---12/07/2009 06:33:57 AM---When activating the 'Valid
Values' trigger our Validator (Xerces) complains about the Node bound to
From:
Joern Turner <joern.turner@googlemail.com>
To:
public-forms@w3.org
Date:
12/07/2009 06:33 AM
Subject:
regarding Testcase 5.1.a
Sent by:
public-forms-request@w3.org
When activating the 'Valid Values' trigger our Validator (Xerces)
complains about the Node bound to QName as there's no namespace
defined for 'my:myelement' and therefore the prefix 'my' cannot be
resolved. The Node becomes invalid.
Declaring a namespace with that prefix fixes that problem in our
implementation. I think Xerces is right here as the QName validation
does not only test for lexical correctness of the QName but also
checks if there a namespace in scope for the given prefix.
Regards,
Joern
[attachment "5.1.a.xhtml" deleted by John Boyer/CanWest/IBM]