W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > December 2009

Re: regarding test case 5.2.1.a,b,c

From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:24:39 -0500
To: Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Joern Turner <joern.turner@googlemail.com>, public-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF56DD821A.5EBB848F-ON8825768C.0069B0F9-8825768C.006A9890@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Charlie,

These tests are a bit odd because you indicated that they work in two 
processors, but they seem to contain a relevance bind that turns all the 
data to non-relevant.  Wondering if you could remove that bind and see if 
the form still works?
Also, I suppose it would be more comfortable if the XForms instances had 
xmlns=""  on them. 

Thanks,
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed: 
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw





From:
Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
To:
Joern Turner <joern.turner@googlemail.com>
Cc:
public-forms@w3.org
Date:
12/09/2009 06:48 AM
Subject:
Re: regarding test case 5.2.1.a,b,c



Hi Joern -- attached are updated versions of tests 5.2.1.a, b, c corrected 
to test for validity on setvalue not form initialization. As you point 
out, validity events should not be fired on form initialization so we have 
modified these tests to set some (arbitrary) initial value but then 
explicity use setvalue to assign null values...testing for validity only 
at that time.

We would appreciate any feedback you could give on these versions before 
we commit them back to the test suite zip file. I have tested them under 
Ubiquity XForms and Mozilla 3.0.15 but any additional feedback would be 
good to have... 

Thanks, Charlie Wiecha

(See attached file: 5.2.1.a.xhtml)(See attached file: 5.2.1.b.xhtml)(See 
attached file: 5.2.1.c.xhtml)

Charles Wiecha
Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 282-3483
wiecha@us.ibm.com


Joern Turner ---11/25/2009 04:49:08 AM---In an attempt to fix the last 
missing issues on the road to full conformance i stumbled about the ab


From:

Joern Turner <joern.turner@googlemail.com>

To:

public-forms@w3.org

Date:

11/25/2009 04:49 AM

Subject:

regarding test case 5.2.1.a,b,c

Sent by:

public-forms-request@w3.org



In an attempt to fix the last missing issues on the road to full
conformance i stumbled about the above mentioned test cases again.

Please can anyone point out to me what is expected here - i travelled
the net and spec for an answer but i simply don't get why this form
should dispatch any xforms-valid xforms-invalid events when a reset
action is triggered. There are no changed values, the relevance of the
Nodes in the first instance is not changed so i cannot see why a
processor should dispatch events in this case (besides the rebuild,
recalculate, revalidate and refresh).

Can someone please shed some light on this?

Regards,

Joern






picture
(image/gif attachment: 01-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 02-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 03-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 04-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 05-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 06-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 07-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 08-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 09-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 10-part)

picture
(image/gif attachment: 11-part)

Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 19:25:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:52 UTC