>Without having discussed this response with the group yet (we shall this >afternoon), wouldn't the text below be exactly what the spec needs? > > It would not be right for XML Base to define what strings > should be considered URIs. That is entirely up to the XML > vocabulary in question. This spec addresses the question: > *given* a relative URI, how is it resolved? I have added a paragraph to the introduction (slightly less informally phrased): This specification does not attempt to specify which strings in a document are considered URIs. That is the responsibility of each XML vocabulary. The question addressed by this specification is: given a relative URI in an XML document, what base URI is it resolved against? Please let us know whether you find this satisfactory. -- Richard -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2008 11:42:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 September 2008 11:42:18 GMT