W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > October 2008

Re: XForms 1.1 editor's draft updated

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:24:04 -0700
Message-Id: <E7F8E3A2-400C-44C3-BBBF-4CE755C0F5AE@orbeon.com>
To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>

> It has been noted in xforms-insert and xforms-delete that although  
> they are notification events in the sense that they have no default  
> processing from the vantage point of the insertion and deletion  
> processing models, the repeat processor does attach behavior to the  
> capture phase of the event.  This was the actual issue raised by  
> Erik.  We talked about solving the issue by removing all language  
> about "notification" events from the spec.  However, this is more of  
> a surgery (spec reorganization) than perhaps we anticipated, not a  
> simple iteration of a removal process.  I think this reorganization  
> work will naturally occur during the modularization refactoring in  
> 1.2, so I'd recommend that we go with the more direct and less  
> invasive fix for now.
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#evt-insert
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#evt-delete

That simple solution works as far as I am concerned.

> The description of the effect of the relevant property on the UI has  
> been edited to avoid a possible misinterpretation that was recently  
> brought to my attention.  Two clarifications occurred.  The  
> application of relevance to an element was explicitly associated  
> with *single-node* *UI bindings*.  There was a sentence which  
> attempted to clarify that direct non-availability of an element due  
> to non-relevance was not an effect applied to action elements, but  
> this was getting confused with the language in Chapter 8 that says  
> actions attached to non-relevant form controls are disabled.
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#model-prop-relevant

Good clarification!


Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
Received on Sunday, 19 October 2008 20:24:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:58 UTC