Re: Incorrect type definitions for xforms:dayTimeDuration and xforms:yearMonthDuration

Hey Erik,

That sounds good.  The more features of XForms 1.1 that are implemented, 
the better!

All the diffs in the editor draft are group-approved, so please feel free 
to work off of that copy.

Also, my "rant" was not intended to call you out in particular, it was 
just that your email provided the impetus for flagging up the issue for 
the group.

That being said, I don't mean to put you on the spot, but you mentioned 
that you're progressing on implementing XForms 1.1, so does that mean 
we'll see an implementation report from you?

:-)

John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed: 
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw





From:
Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
To:
Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
Date:
11/19/2008 11:29 PM
Subject:
Re: Incorrect type definitions for xforms:dayTimeDuration and 
xforms:yearMonthDuration




Amazing that it's been almost a year since this issue was reported. 
Apologies for not checking the editor's draft.

To be fair, I am reporting this because I was implementing the email 
and card-number types, and therefore progressing in the implementation 
of XForms 1.1!

-Erik

On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:46 PM, John Boyer wrote:

>
> This is the point where I get to complain as working group chair 
> that we as a team are not doing a good enough job of producing 
> implementation reports that will advance XForms 1.1 CR through to 
> full Recommendation.
>
> How does this relate to the errors reported, you ask?  Well, the 
> problem is that this has already been fixed in the editor's draft, 
> and it has been fixed for so long [1] that it is becoming hard to 
> remember these things are fixed.
>
> [1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Dec/0003.html
>
> With apologies for using this issue as a platform... It's been too 
> long.  We *really* need the members of this group to devote more 
> time to reporting their results so that we can advance the work we 
> are all deploying to the field to W3C Recommendation.  We can't keep 
> living on the editor's draft because most people, including working 
> group members, are going to the published spec.
>
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
> Blog RSS feed: 
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
> To:
> Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
> Date:
> 11/19/2008 09:30 PM
> Subject:
> Incorrect type definitions for xforms:dayTimeDuration and 
> xforms:yearMonthDuration
>
>
>
>
>
> Both type definitions say name="email", which is obviously wrong:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#dt-dayTimeDuration
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#dt-yearMonthDuration
>
> -Erik
>
> --
> Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
> http://www.orbeon.com/
>
>
>
>

--
Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
http://www.orbeon.com/