W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Candidate Recommendation Transition Request for XForms 1.1

From: Steve Bratt <steve@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:50:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4740F9FD.3070708@w3.org>
To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: timbl@w3.org, W3C Comm Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, chairs@w3.org, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>

John,

Thank you for this complete request.  A few comments/questions:

* I assume when you say:
"Two interoperable implementations of each required feature and one implementation of each feature." ... you mean s/each feature/each optional feature ... in the status section.

* Are there any features at risk?

* This comment: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xforms11-lc-doc-20071114.html#ssec124
was rejected by the group and the commenter was unhappy.  We can talk about this, and the other "editorial" (so marked) comments that the commenters were not happy about on the call.

I'm happy to go forward with a transition call.  Here are times (US ET) in the coming week that work for me:

Mon 19 Nov: noon - 2pm; 4-5pm
Wed 21 Nov: 11am - 4pm
(in China the following week)
Mon 3 Dec: noon - 5pm
Tue 4 Dec: 9am - 2:30pm
Wed 5 Dec: noon - 4pm
Fri 7 Dec: any time

Regards,

Steve

On 11/14/2007 9:17 PM, John Boyer wrote:
> 
> *Document Title:* XForms 1.1
> 
> *URI:* http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html
> 
> *Estimated publication date:* Nov. 29, 2007
> 
> Please note that the above linked document is marked as editor's draft 
> and dated Nov. 15, 2007.  This is done to adhere to new W3C policies 
> regarding the marking of documents that are not in TR space.  Once the 
> transition meeting has occurred and assuming the approval of the 
> transition, the editor's draft mark and the date will be changed to 
> reflect the publication date.
> 
> *Abstract:* 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#abstract
> 
> *Status:* 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#status
> 
> *Differences between XForms 1.0 and 1.1* (informative): 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#intro-diffs
> 
> 
> *General Requirements for Advancement: 
> **http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#transition-reqs*
> *=========================================================================================* 
> 
> *1. Record group decision to request advancement*
> 
> The resolution was recorded in the Nov. 14 telecon minute: 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/14-forms-minutes.html
> 
> *2. Public documentation of all changes, substantive and minor (diff 
> marked version; need report of substantive changes, if any)*
> 
> Diff-marked version: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html
> Last call report: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xforms11-lc-doc-20071114.html
> 
> *3. Report any changed requirements*
> 
> There have been no changes of requirements from last call.
> 
> *4. Report any changes in dependencies with other groups*
> 
> None for XForms 1.1
> 
> *5. Show evidence of wide review *
> 
> The last call report shows we received and responded to 144 last call 
> comments from the public:
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xforms11-lc-doc-20071114.html
> 
> *6. Formally address all issues *
> 
> Last call report: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xforms11-lc-doc-20071114.html
> 
> *7. Report any formal objections *
> 
> There were no formal objections to advancement to candidate recommendation
> 
> 
> *CR-specific Requirements: 
> **http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi*
> *===================================================================*
> *1. Should provide report of present and expected implementations*
> 
> This is in the status of the document: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#status
> 
> Preliminary implementation report: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/Preliminary_XForms_1.1_Implementations
> 
> *2. Any features at risk? *
> 
> This is in the status of the document: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#status
> Features at risk: None
> 
> *3. Expect to meet any requirements other than standard for PR *
> 
> This is in the status of the document: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#status
> Two interoperable implementations of each required feature and one 
> implementation of each feature.
> 
> *4. Must indicate minimum duration*
> 
> This is in the status of the document: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#status
> Minimum Duration: 14 Feb 2008
> 
> *5. Should indicate expected duration*
> 
> This is in the status of the document: 
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-all.html#status
> Expected Duration: 15 May 2008
> 
> Thanks,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com  
> 
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
> 

-- 
Steven R Bratt    mailto:steve@w3.org
Chief Executive Officer
World Wide Web Consortium   http://www.w3.org/
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
32 Vassar Street, Rm G522, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA / tel: +1.617.253.7697
Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 02:52:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:46 UTC