W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Conclusion to effects of readonly on trigger

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:58:22 +0100
Message-ID: <640dd5060705021358v61645aay114ccfd48424e17e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: public-forms@w3.org

Hi John,

I think that captures it. :)

The other thing that came up, which I for one hadn't thought of
before, was a need to clarify the behaviour of xf:triggers when they
appear inside a non-relevant group, or are themselves non-relevant. We
know that non-relevant controls should not _receive_ events, but
should we say that they don't initiate them either? In other words,
clicking a xf:trigger should have no effect?

To clarify the situation I'm thinking of, we've said (at least in
XForms 1.1) that non-relevant controls act as if they aren't there in
the UI, and therefore don't receive events. But it is possible that
some processor might choose to render the controls--perhaps in a
greyed out style--but still not give them any events. That processor
would still have implemented the specification correctly. This
therefore opens up the possibility that a user could click on a
'disabled' trigger, which in turn means that we need to be explicit
about the fact that the control should not generate any events.

Regards,

Mark

On 02/05/07, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I think we were pretty close to a conclusion on the telecon about the
> interpretation of the readonly MIP for trigger.
>
> Whatever the decision, it seems worthwhile make note of it in the spec given
> that we had some work to do getting through the points ourselves.
>
> Let's see if we can get this wrapped up on the list during the week and/or
> get a clear statement of resolution that folks can vote on next week if
> necessary.
>
> Here is what I understood from the discussion:
>
> 1) Like all other events for MIPs, the xforms-readonly and xforms-readwrite
> events are received by a trigger bound to a node (when the processing model
> says those events are to be dispatched, of course).
>
> 2) The readonly MIP is a statement about the what can happen to the data
> node.  Since a trigger does not directly manipulate the data node via  its
> UI binding, there is no direct relationship between the data node being
> readonly and presentational properties of the trigger.  Specifically,
>
> a) The ability to activate a trigger is not disabled if the trigger is bound
> to a readonly node
> b) The default countenance of the trigger is unaffected, i.e. it does not
> take on a disabled countenance
>
> Cheers,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
>  STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
>  Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
>  Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
>  IBM Victoria Software Lab
>  E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
>  Blog:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 20:58:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:43 UTC