W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > June 2007

Re: A number of issues from Aaron are missing (action for Steven)

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:53:49 +0200
To: Ulrich Nicolas Lissť <unl@dreamlab.net>, "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: public-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tuhcvzj3smjzpq@acer3010.wlan.cwi.nl>

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:39:21 +0200, Ulrich Nicolas Lissť  
<unl@dreamlab.net> wrote:

> John, I'm happy to do that. However, I'm not on www-forms-editor@w3.org
> so I can't split up Aaron's original message and do some redirects.
> Steven, could you please do this for me? I'd suggest that we have a
> particular issue for each of Aaron's 39 bullet points.

Ugh, groan. That's a real wrist breaker... I was afraid someone might  
suggest that.

> I would then do the whole issue resorting in the database. Two questions
> come to my mind:
>
> 1. How do we handle messages which already have been answered and are
> split up afterwards?

Add a reference to the issue where it has been answered in the notes field.

> 2. How do we handle duplicates? We only have "None", "Accept", "Modify
> and Accept", "Reject" and "Defer" for resolution.

Mark it as duplicate in the notes field, and use the same resolution.

The fact it is a duplicate only means we don't have to discuss it twice,  
but it still has to be treated normally otherwise.

Steven

> Regards,
> Uli.
>
> John Boyer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Uli and Steven,
>>
>> First off, I realize that I asked Steven to take care of this because he
>> did the initial pass through the email and entered the issues, but I now
>> realize it is probably more appropriate to ask Uli to do this task.
>>
>> Second, if I may add to the fifth and seventh parts of the request below
>> as follows:
>>
>> Please also make #22 into a separate issue under XPath.
>> Please also make separate issues for #32, #35 and #36.
>>
>> The above are not as easy to resolve without the involvement of group
>> members.
>>
>> Thanks, Uli.
>>
>> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
>> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
>> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
>> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
>> IBM Victoria Software Lab
>> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA*
>> Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org
>>
>> 06/22/2007 07:59 AM
>>
>> 	
>> To
>> 	steven.pemberton@cwi.nl
>> cc
>> 	public-forms@w3.org
>> Subject
>> 	A number of issues from Aaron are missing (action for Steven)
>>
>>
>> 	
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> Can I please get your help in getting Aaron's last call issues into the
>> system.
>>
>> Issue #37 is in the trash because it states that Aaron's 39 issues from
>> April 30 was broken into separate mails.
>>
>> First of all, the issue only has the first 26 of the 39 issues in it, so
>> please watch out for that in the points below.
>>
>> Second, there does not even seem to be a topic for the "Structure"
>> section of the spec (Section 3), where Aaron's issues 5 through 14 go.
>>  However, some issues on Section 3 from you, Steven, are in the Model
>> topic (which I might have thought was for section 4)
>>
>> Third, I think "Model" might be the right topic for Aaron's 15 through
>> 19, but I think we need one issue for #16 and another for #15 + #17-#19.
>>
>> Fourth, #1 and #15 are good examples because they are covered by other
>> people's issues.  So, it is unclear if they are not entered because of
>> that, but the problem with not entering them is that *Aaron* would never
>> get a response to the issue.  It seems like we need to enter all of his
>> issues even if they are duplicates with others.
>>
>> Fifth, His section 7 comments don't seem to show up under XPath.
>>
>> Sixth, could I please have your help tracing through the rest of his
>> issues to make sure they appear, as I gave up looking at about this  
>> point.
>>
>> Seventh, please make sure #28 is an issue by itself.
>>
>> Finally, note that I have already implemented almost all of the changes
>> needed, so I just need issues made so I can compose and send the  
>> replies.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
>> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
>> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
>> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
>> IBM Victoria Software Lab
>> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 13:53:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:43 UTC