W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > July 2007

RE: serialization=""

From: <Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:10:25 +0200
To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
Cc: ebruchez@orbeon.com, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>, public-forms-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBF3AA55C.750A32A8-ONC1257324.0042A49B-C1257324.0042DDC2@inventivegroup.com>

and when using namespaces xmlns=""

Nick Van den Bleeken  -  Research & Development
Inventive Designers
Phone: +32 - 3 - 8210170
Fax: +32 - 3 - 8210171
Email: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com



"Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> 
Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org
07/25/2007 11:08 PM

To
<ebruchez@orbeon.com>, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: serialization=""







Just FYI we also use a "" in includenamespaceprefixes.
Leigh. 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Erik Bruchez
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:48 PM
To: Forms WG (new)
Subject: serialization=""


All,

We thought about this at Orbeon and we think that using a blank value 
for the attribute remains awkward. It is pretty much unseen in XML-based

languages out there, and it could also indicate that the developer has 
forgotten to put a value for the attribute.

"none" is not a media type, but neither is a blank string. So I am going

to be a flip-flopper here and get back to the idea that "none" is 
preferable to an empty attribute.

-Erik

-- 
Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
http://www.orbeon.com/






--------------------------------------------------

Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:

http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 12:10:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:44 UTC