W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Need response to request for 1.0 erratum

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:31:24 +0200
To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tvch1xuhsmjzpq@acer3010.lan>

I don't believe an erratum is needed for such an obviously tiny typo.

Steven

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:12:03 +0200, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:

> The instance() function description in Section 7.11.1 says:
>
> An XForms Model can contain more that one instance
>
> and should say
>
> An XForms Model can contain more than one instance.
>
> This is fixed in the editors draft of XForms 1.1, but a www-forms-editor
> email
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Jul/0010.html)
> clarified that it was a request to fix 1.0.
>
> Would a diff-marked spec fix without erratum be sufficient?  Is an  
> erratum
> needed for this small a change?
>
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
>
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 09:31:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:44 UTC