- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:18:35 +0200
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-forms@w3.org
On Thursday, July 5, 2007, 12:08:47 AM, John wrote: JB> JB> Hi Mark and Chris, JB> JB> Based on the feedback, I would've thought that the sentence would JB> have contained "(through extensions, plugins or AJAX)" or JB> something like that. Taking the time to mention 'extension' JB> distinctly from plugin seems at least somewhat worthwhile for the JB> reasons you (Mark) mentioned, though I agree that I don't see much JB> difference really. Mentioning AJAX in addition to plugins seems JB> far more important as we do have vendors delivering XForms JB> capability or content+capability to the client side without a JB> plugin/extension by using AJAX. In fact, I think you're (Mark is) JB> probably one in that camp too, now that I think about it. JB> JB> So, Chris, would it be possible to further amend as above? It all looks like clarificatory, editorial wording and not a change of scope, so I don't see a problem with it. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2007 22:19:58 UTC