W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms-tf@w3.org > April 2008

Re: XForms Simplified Forms Syntax Review Needed

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:00:47 +0200
To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: chris.wilson@microsoft.com, connolly@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>, public-forms-tf@w3.org, steven@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t81n7ldb64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:01:27 +0200, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> It remains unclear why that vote was taken since it preempts the
> collaborative work of the task force required in both WG charters.

It seems only fair that both WGs are allowed to work on proposals.


> Gregory can formally object at any point, and the HTML WG can reopen the
> issue at the discretion of the chairs if there is some new technical
> information, [...]

I was not debating that.


I'd be fine with reviewing the proposal from the Forms WG though I share  
Maciej's concerns. The proposal is very incomplete compared to Web Forms  
2.0 and I also wonder whether such work is in scope of this Task Force  
given the Task Force charter.

By the way, we'd still welcome a thorough review of Web Forms 2.0 by the  
Forms WG.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 17:02:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 April 2008 17:02:21 GMT