- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:00:47 +0200
- To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: chris.wilson@microsoft.com, connolly@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>, public-forms-tf@w3.org, steven@w3.org
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:01:27 +0200, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > It remains unclear why that vote was taken since it preempts the > collaborative work of the task force required in both WG charters. It seems only fair that both WGs are allowed to work on proposals. > Gregory can formally object at any point, and the HTML WG can reopen the > issue at the discretion of the chairs if there is some new technical > information, [...] I was not debating that. I'd be fine with reviewing the proposal from the Forms WG though I share Maciej's concerns. The proposal is very incomplete compared to Web Forms 2.0 and I also wonder whether such work is in scope of this Task Force given the Task Force charter. By the way, we'd still welcome a thorough review of Web Forms 2.0 by the Forms WG. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 17:02:21 UTC