On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:43:11 +0200, Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net > > wrote: >> which i can see being problematic for you in the future -- is there >> another -- later time -- that is amenable to all? at this point, >> unless maciej and nick object, i think that the 1 november 2007 >> date is the most likely suspect for our initial meeting, but i also >> suspect that a different time might work out better for you in the >> future, maciej... > > Friday November 2 would work for me as well for the initial meeting > anyway. Any time after and including 1000 UMT and before 1800 UMT > would be good. If that works for everyone else that seems better. I'm thinking October 31 is most likely for me, unless we do it AM pacific time on Nov 2 (I can make an effort to be up early). It looks like my Nov 2 engagement actually starts at noon. Cheers, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 22:13:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:39 GMT