W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fixing-appcache@w3.org > March 2012

Re: fixing-appcache - Choosing a Chair for your Community Group

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:45:46 +0000
To: "jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com" <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>, "robin@berjon.com" <robin@berjon.com>, "coralie@w3.org" <coralie@w3.org>
CC: "public-fixing-appcache@w3.org" <public-fixing-appcache@w3.org>, "team-community-process@w3.org" <team-community-process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CB8CF2A8.6C04D%tobie@fb.com>
The AppCache situation has improved, but isn't quite there yet.

That said, I don't think the CG is the best venue for fixing what still
needs to be fixed.

I would suggest closing it with a note mentioning that the conversation
best belongs in the HTML WG's issue tracker you might even want to list
the open issues (See:
for details).

Slightly related note: we're still missing the report from the Offline
Workshop. That would help moving things forward and improve the situation.


On 3/14/12 1:03 PM, "jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com"
<jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> wrote:

>Hello everyone,
>We should indeed discuss the usefulness of this group. I think that
>unfortunately the issues we raised during the workshop have not been
>addressed since then, but the current activity of this community group
>will not allow to do it.
>I agree with Robin that we need to decide if this group should be kept
>alive. I think the original idea was good, and I really want to
>participate to the initiative if that group stays alive.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com]
>Sent: 14 March 2012 11:54
>To: Coralie Mercier
>Cc: public-fixing-appcache@w3.org; team-community-process@w3.org
>Subject: Re: fixing-appcache - Choosing a Chair for your Community Group
>Hi all,
>On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:49 , Coralie Mercier wrote:
>> I noticed that Web Payments Community Group currently has no Chair.
>What Coralie meant here is that Fixing Application Cache has no Chair,
>I'm sure :)
>> The Chair is responsible for ensuring the group fulfills the
>requirements of the Community and Business Group Process as well as the
>group's operational agreements.
>I think that the question for this group is: do we need to keep it
>alive, or are we satisfied that the issues raised in the workshop are
>being addressed? If we don't need it, we should shut it down. If we do
>need it, then we need to feed it :)
>Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 13:46:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:41:26 UTC