On 12 June 2013 01:00, Darrell Prince` <prince.darrell@gmail.com> wrote: > Tend to agree, on a range of issues. Lawyers are very, oh, it takes time > with the system, even for things like stop and frisk. Blatantly illegal. > > Heres what google said. > > > http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/asking-us-government-to-allow-google-to.html > "we offer encryption across our services; we have hired some of the best security engineers" Yet I have not yet seen an option for end to end encryption e.g. through gtalk ... surely that would solve at least *some* of the issues ... > > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > You mean like this? >> > >> > >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/26/clapper-v-amnesty-international-warrantless-wiretapping-supreme-court_n_2765931.html >> >> If that really happened (and since we're talking/researching about the >> NSA and on an electronic medium at that, I can't take it as the >> complete reality just yet -- there is clearly a lot of strange and >> mis-information going around), then it was not approached correctly. >> Sue people directly (Snowden named names, right?) if possible and let >> the system determine how to handle this issue of "how to handle this" >> issue of its very fabric. There should be pro bono, Constitutional >> lawyers bringing a case to the court, defending their country. What >> the hell? >> >> Clearly there's no leadership happening whatsoever (if the President >> hasn't made a stand on and against it), so the People must exercise >> their right. If the government isn't working for the People, then >> bring it down. Refuse to pay taxes. This is ridiculous. >> >> -- >> MarkJ >> Tacoma, Washington >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 23:19:26 UTC