Re: Position papers / workshop Re: FSW CG now has 100 members

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 08:51, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de> wrote:
>
>> Harry Halpin:
>> > Just to remind people, the W3C is thinking heavily of starting
>> > standardization in this general area, but we need your position papers
>> > ASAP:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/
>>
>> I will not be able to travel to the US. Will it be possible to
>> participate via Internet (Open Standards preferred) ?
>>
>> I noticed that the Program Committee for that workshop mostly consists
>> of people who do not seem to be active in the Federated Social Web
>> community.
>>
>
> FWIW of the technology mentioned the 3 I'd like to see standardized are:
>
> 1. Open Graph Protocol (almost complete already?)
>
> 2. Activity Streams (Under way at IETF?)
>
>
+1



> 3. Indie Web Protocols (Seems to be practical and active)
>
>

What are "Indie Web Protocols" ?

Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 15:59:58 UTC