W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fedsocweb@w3.org > November 2012

Re: After TPAC Social: Friday 7 Nov 15:00-16:00 UTC

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:53:29 +0100
Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
Message-Id: <63C33D59-9A9F-4571-B6C9-FE218792CBC2@bblfish.net>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>

On 7 Nov 2012, at 18:19, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
>   The TPAC meeting in Lyon was I think quite clearly a great success.  So to follow up on this the WebID XG is organising a Teleconf on the W3C system to help move things to the next stage.
> I got the following slot for this Friday:
> 
>   Fridays 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local)
>   Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID")
>   30 participants
>   other timezones: http://timeanddate.com/s/2a4w
>   ( there are phone numbers for other parts of the world, does anyone have a list of those? )

There are no more teleconf numbers in the rest of the world, but that's ok because you can use free voice over IP calling to connect.
This is explained here:

  http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP

There are a number of VOIP clients around. For example on apple there is 
http://icanblink.com/



> 
> Here is the proposed agenda for this teleconf:
> 
> 1) Overview of what happened at TPAC
>   The summary is online, but there are some things that are difficult to put in writing.
>      http://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/TPAC-Lyon-2012
>   ( eg. how the W3C process works and why it is useful )
> 
> 2) The LDP group has to create a note laying some basic principles for what an
>  Access Control System should look like, but they don't want to get sidetracked in 
>  an implementeable spec. Should we as part of the RWW take on to put something together here?
> 
> 3) The WebID definition was changed at the meeting, but this lead to a lot of pushback on the mailing list. I proposed this as a compromise
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Nov/0020.html
>  Is this an improvement?
> 
> 4) Most important: is this date ok to continue having WebID/RWW/SocialWeb meetings for
>  everybody? We could have those topics take turns so that we don't get tired with the same topic, and as this would help us enlarge our horizons.
> 
> 
> Henry
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/



Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 09:54:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 November 2012 09:54:04 GMT