Re: Introduction and question

Hi Wyb and Michiel,

>> I have just joined the group and some other groups of W3C

I'm also new to this group and I share Wyb's enthusiasm regarding open
standards and federated social web!

> To understand federated social web you need to at least understand the
> ideas behind xmpp federation and the ideas behind OStatus federation.

I'm the author of ISS/IM (Instant Syndicating Standards), which was
greatly inspired by XMPP. Nowadays we are more focused on bringing
this technology to the Web. I'll be launching a free e-book in about 2
months from now which details this technology specifically for the
Web, but for now you can access information about it at our website:

http://iss.im/

I have also created a group here at W3C with the following description:

http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#iss-im

"ISS/IM is an open set of standards that empowers individuals to
discover and syndicate information through the help of their own
personal social network. As of today, there is no existing technology
that allows individuals to share information in a bottom-up manner on
a global scale. ISS/IM is a proposal to create just that: a
distributed worldwide recommender system perfectly tuned to output a
very personalized stream of information for each individual, where
information flows from the personal social network towards the whole
wide world."

I look forward to working together with the community, specially with
this group, which is very much a relevant alternative to today's
centralized social networks.

Kind regards,
Nick


On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> wrote:
> Welcome! It's not an all-or-nothing technology. It's a loose
> collection of techniques that, together, make the Indie web, as well
> as the APIs of the web's big platforms, more 'social'.
>
> IMHO (others probably have more info to add):
>
> ActivityStreams is a very central part of federated social web, you
> may want to start there.
>
> To understand federated social web you need to at least understand the
> ideas behind xmpp federation and the ideas behind OStatus federation.
> Since both work with ActivityStreams, they're not necessarily mutually
> exclusive. Read-write web is also relevant, i guess.
>
> Webfinger is also quite central, but it's currently being merged with
> swd, which means that the spec-development activity is taking place at
> the IETF's appsawg list (and this is quite technical stuff so maybe a
> bit boring). that's something you wouldn't know as a newcomer
> obviously. so if you want to know something, don't be afraid to ask!
>
> Even though there's no central organization (apart from maybe
> workshops where people come together), together we can answer each
> other's questions and between all of us we asymptotically have sort of
> an overview :) at least we can try to point you to where to look, and
> the more you read and follow the discussions, the more you yourself
> become a part of the knowledge base (that's how we all started, i
> guess).
>
> Anyway, welcome, and don't be afraid to ask questions! There are
> probably other people who have the same questions as you, so it's
> useful to ask them on this list.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Michiel
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:50 PM, wyb mail <wybmail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have just joined the group and some other groups of W3C
>>
>> As a supporter of open standards and because of my study Informatics,
>> combining among others social sciences and ICT,
>>
>> I am very curious about what you are doing and how you are working.
>>
>> I hope I can contribute something to the group though I am not really an
>> engineer
>>
>>
>> Are you still active as a group? Since January there does not seem to be
>> much activity concerning topics send to this address.
>>
>>
>>
>> I was looking through your pages but it not exactly what is worked on at
>> this moment
>>
>> What was interesting to see is how many platforms are working on a federated
>> social web
>>
>> What kind protocols are they working with, do they have all their own
>> standards?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards, Wyb
>

Received on Sunday, 20 May 2012 09:34:41 UTC